Wednesday, February 29, 2012

VIDEO : CNN : President Obama will Win in a Landslide with a lot of help from Latinos Says Charles Garcia ( Big Financier Banker, Rich Money Man ), Christine Romans, business correspondent and anchor for CNN

.
This strange rich man is a "turncoat" from Strong Bush Republican to Strong Obama Supporter. Money Manager Charles Garcia is based in Florida, a friend of Jeb Bush and George W. Bush, he raised a lot of funds and moneys for the presidential campaigns of George W. Bush, Charles Garcia is considered one of the Top Hispanic Men in Business.

Charles Patrick GarcĂ­a (born 1961) had recently started Garcia Trujillo LLC, a consulting, merchant banking, and venture capital firm where he is the Chief Executive Officer. He also publishes many books on leadership, motivation and going into Business.

Obama could even lose Florida and Ohio and get reelected.

Arizona and Missouri could be flipped to Blue ( Democrat Party ) - These six states : Colorado, Indiana, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico and North Carolina are very possible for Obama.

Republican Candidates are pandering to extremists and Tea Party and will be rejected on general election time by Latinos.

President Obama Wins in a Landslide Because of Latinos Says Charles Garcia

Uploaded by ARTLOVERRR on Feb 24, 2012


President Obama Wins in a Landslide Because of Latinos Says Charles Garcia




**********************************

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Low voter turnout reported in Michigan Republican primary - This looks like a bad omen for the Republican Party in November 6, 2012 - Low number of voters and little interest in the primaries are good predictors of low turnout in the General Election

.
The GOP has a problem of low interest and lack of enthusiasm. Number of voters seem lower than in 2008, specially those that identify themselves as Republican.

Bets in INTRADE.COM for Presidential Election :

Barack Obama to be re-elected President in 2012 : 60.2%

Mitt Romney to be Republican Presidential Nominee in 2012 : 83.9%

Rick Santorum to be Republican Presidential Nominee in 2012 : 6.8%

If the Economy does not falter and unemployment is under 8% then it is a good bet that Obama will win reelection.

......

"Tell Me With Whom You Walk and I Will Tell You Who You Are" : Mitt Romney walks today with the most anti-immigrant officials in America : Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio; hardliner Sheriff Paul Babeu; former California Gov. Pete Wilson; Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, and Gov. Jan Brewer

.
Huffington Post
Tell Me With Whom You Walk and I Will Tell You Who You Are
Ruben Gallego and Anna Tovar
February 28, 2012

Tell Me With Whom You Walk and I Will Tell You Who You Are

Some excerpts :

Romney, the frontrunner for the Republican nomination for president, is actively courting the most divisive and extreme advocates on one of the critical issues our next president will decide.

His own anti-immigrant positions are alarming - not just for Latinos, but for all Americans who recognize that our diverse nation of immigrants is stronger when we stand united. President Obama believes strongly that our diversity is what makes America great, which is why he has fought hard for commonsense and comprehensive immigration reform and the DREAM Act.

Romney used to believe in these solutions, too. But now that he needs to pander to the Tea Party, he's severely changed his tune.

He once supported Sen. John McCain's and Sen. Ted Kennedy's comprehensive immigration reform bill, calling it "reasonable." Now he surrounds himself with these shameful advisors and derides sensible proposals as "magnets." He once said it didn't make sense to deport the 11 million undocumented immigrants living in this country. Now he wants to kick them all out, saying the inhumane policy of "self-deportation" is the answer for families who have lived here for generations and served their communities or in the military.

And Romney has promised to veto the DREAM Act for responsible young immigrants - and even called it a "handout," as though going to college or serving in the military is a free pass.
........

Jennifer Granholm ( former governor of Michigan ) : Republicans are a gift to Democrats : They are now anti-gay, anti-woman, anti-immigrant, anti-Latino, anti-Muslim, anti-Europe (particularly the French and the Greeks), anti-labor, anti-poor, anti-99 percent and now anti-college graduate

.
This New GOP rhetoric enables us to eagerly welcome your castoffs into the Democratic Party where inclusivity is celebrated and their contributions are welcome.


POLITICO.COM
Thanks, GOP candidates, for move to far right
February 27, 2012


By Jennifer Granholm
Jennifer Granholm is the former governor of Michigan. She is now the host of “The War Room” on Current TV. She is also a visiting public policy and law professor at the University of California — Berkeley.


Thanks, GOP candidates, for move to far right


Some excerpts :

To appeal to the Republican base voter these days, GOP candidates are earnestly discussing ways to dismantle government — whether it’s the Energy Department, Education Department or … whatever the third one is. The far right is focused on shrinking government so small that it drowns in a bathtub — but reappears in state-mandated vaginal ultrasound probes.

Attacking the massive deficits that “harm our children’s future” by proposing tax cuts that add a whopping $5 trillion to the deficit. Skewering the rescue of the auto industry in one commercial while boasting about being pro-manufacturing in the next.

Indeed, the long primary will mean that the newly invigorated far right has ensured that the so-called traditional conservatives — like my dad’s generation, the save-your-money, make-prudent-but-conservative-investments kind of conservatives, the pragmatists who are uneasy with the cultural battles — well, they’re obviously disposable.

Dad couldn’t care less about legislating access to women’s contraception or ordering vaginal ultrasound probes — the very subjects make him uncomfortable. He cares about rational economic policy. But his party has left him, gone to tea.

It’s a trend that would have caused former Michigan Gov. George Romney to grimace. Mitt Romney’s Detroit bashing stands in painful contrast to his father’s compassionate, moderate legacy. Where did the pragmatic Mitt Romney of Massachusetts go? The one who thought it was important to offer access to health care to all his citizens? He, too, has gone to tea.

We’ve all watched Romney straining against his genes and his history, contorting himself into a human pretzel, twisting into an anti-immigrant frenzy, an unlikely chameleon of the severe far right.
.......

In their zeal to “let Detroit go bankrupt,” what’s left unsaid is the fact that the tea-steeped Republican presidential candidates are bankrupt of new ideas for moving this country forward in an aggressive global economy, bankrupt of compassion for those who are less fortunate and bankrupt of compromise with those who view the issues differently than they do.
...............

Monday, February 27, 2012

HuffPost : Michigan's Republicans rammed a bill creating this statewide primary through the legislature to the cost of $10,000,000 paid by Taxpayers. Democrats can make mischief and maybe deliver a mortal wound to the Romney campaign

.
To all Democrats in Michigan : Cast your vote for Santorum for maximum effect and maximum havoc. ..... Savor the opportunity to cause problems to GOP. After all you ( the taxpayer ) are paying for it.



Huffington Post
Michigan Dems, Independents Should Vote for Santorum in Michigan Primary
By Joe DiSano
Long-time veteran of Michigan politics
February 24, 2012


Michigan Dems, Independents Should Vote for Santorum in Michigan Primary


Some excerpts :

Let's be clear though -- chances are good Mitt Romney will be the GOP nominee regardless of what happens in Michigan. But we can assist in making it as costly for Romney and his corporate supporters as possible. It is in every Democrats best interest for this process to continue right up until the GOP convention.
.................

I would wager the American public would render any political party with a brokered convention as unfit to run the government. We can help create that out come this Tuesday.

Now some will say that we could actually help deliver the nomination to Santorum and we may regret that outcome.

Don't be distracted by the sideshow. Santorum matters little on Tuesday. He is only a convenient vessel to embarrass Romney on the national stage. The Romney people have set the bar so high in Michigan through their massive spending Romney needs to win a resounding victory in Michigan of at least 10 percent to beat expectations and quell the demands for a stronger nominee. The national press is ready to tell the story that Romney got beat on his home turf. You can help make that happen.
.................

To vote in the Republican primary a voter simply needs to request to do so. You don't need to say that you are a Republican, and you would still be able to vote in the Michigan Democratic Party May 5 caucuses, and to re-elect President Obama in November.
.........

Sunday, February 26, 2012

For President Obama, whose reelection bid depends on high support from women voters, the Arizona Republican Debate was gold. Even better was when the candidates discussed immigration : Mitt Romney endorsed the Arizona anti-immigration law as a model for the nation

.
"Newt Gingrich supported a massive wall on the border, Ron Paul doubled-down on the myth that undocumented immigrants “use up” public resources".

Even if Republicans were trying to make themselves a hard sell for women and Latinos, they couldn't have done a better job. The Obama campaign must be thrilled.


The American Prospect
And the Winner Is: Barack Obama
By Jamelle Bouie
February 22, 2012


And the Winner Is: Barack Obama


Some excerpts :

Without question, the winner of Wednesday’s Republican debate was Barack Obama. This wasn’t apparent at the beginning; during the first forty minutes, Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul argued about earmarks, and made the usual promise to cut taxes, cut spending, and magically balance the budget. But by the end of the event, the candidates had revealed their hostility toward women and Latinos, and further ensured that they would stay on Obama’s side into the fall.

It wasn’t actually until after the first commercial break that moderator John King asked the candidates about the elephant in the room—birth control. After Gingrich went through the usual motion of insulting King for posing the question, the candidates embarked on a fantastic voyage of obfuscation, dishonesty, and outright attacks on women’s health.
...........

VIDEO, Evangelical Christian Pastor Eric Holmberg is a fan of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, this minister has always voted Republican and dislikes Obama and the Democrats. But he will never vote for Mitt Romney

.
This very patriotic man voted for George W. Bush and does not love Al Gore, but he will never vote for Mitt Romney. He gives his Biblical and Theological Reasons to reject the anti-Christian and unChristian Mormonism, which for him is a cult.

Pastor Eric Holmberg says : "A Big Warning to the Republican Aristocracy in Washington". He implies that many Honest and Decent Christian Conservatives won't vote for Mitt Romney".



Pastor Eric Holmberg asks us not to consider him as a bigot !


Mitt Romney, Mormonism and the 2012 Election

Uploaded by VorthosForum on Feb 3, 2012

There are several DVDs offered here that factually examine the Mormon cult from a number of angles:


Mitt Romney, Mormonism and the 2012 Election





*************************

Saturday, February 25, 2012

VIDEO, "Morning Joe" Joe Scarborough, Car Czar Steve Rattner Completely Debunks Romney Detroit Auto "Managed Bankruptcy" Fantasy and Nonsense, without the huge government bailout nobody would have saved the auto industry

.
From Wikipedia :

In February 2009, with both General Motors and Chrysler on the brink of insolvency, Rattner was appointed Counselor to the United States Secretary of the Treasury and lead auto adviser. He quickly assembled a team that grew to 14 professionals to address this key element of the national economic crisis.

Reporting to both Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Lawrence Summers, the head of the National Economic Council, Rattner and his auto task force developed a plan to save both the two manufacturers and related suppliers and finance companies. The plan involved a total government investment of $82 billion in the sector, coupled with controlled bankruptcies for the two auto companies, as well as new management for both . 

Controversially, in order to get the bond holders on board with the bailout, Rattner threatened the reputation of them. Rattner later wrote in his book Overhaul: An Insider's Account of the Obama Administration's Emergency Auto Rescue that the toughest decision for President Obama was whether to save Chrysler. There was no disagreement, he later wrote, about asking GM CEO Richard Wagoner to step aside.

By July 2009, both automakers had emerged from bankruptcy, had new management and were on their way to renewed profitability. At that time, Rattner left Washington and returned to private life in New York.


Uploaded by incitebytes on Feb 24, 2012

Clip from February 24, 2012, MSNBC Morning Joe, where Car Czar, Steve Rattner, completely debunks Mitt Romney's nonsense, fantasy claim that his suggested "managed bankruptcy" for the Detroit auto companies without the huge government bailout would have saved the auto industry. Rattner correctly points out that, since no one was willing/able to lend the huge sums of money necessary for the auto companies to survive, that it was either take the government money and survive or not take it and liquidate.


Car Czar, Steve Rattner, Completely Debunks Romney Detroit Auto "Managed Bankruptcy" Fantasy




********************************

Friday, February 24, 2012

Protestant Theologian Jerry Johnson against Mitt Romney : "Name one time Israel had a pagan King sitting on her throne and God just poured out blessing upon the people and the country. Please my friend, read the book of Judges again"

.
I am an atheist that enjoys and feels pleasure with theologians Catholic or Protestant.

This Theologian, pastor or minister Jerry Johnson seems to be sincere and not the usual exploiter of fools and freeloader parasite of the weak. Read his Forums and watch his videos in this page. In the forum many people are perturbed or angry, they are usually extremely conservative ( not me ! ).

Jerry Johnson is an important Protestant Christian Historian and Intellectual - He gives extreme importance to the Epistles of apostle Paul and to the Nicene Council and Nicene Creed that unified Christians and defined the doctrine.

"The sacred and inspired Scriptures
are sufficient to declare the truth."
--Athanasius, Defender of orthodoxy,
Council of Nicaea A.D. 325

Nicene Council

Jerry Johnson is extremely worried about the possibility of Mitt Romney being president of the USA, because he finds that Mitt's faith totally contradicts the Christian Faith as defined by his beloved Nicene Council that took place in Nicaea in 325 after Jesus Christ.

According to his interpretation and knowledge of the Bible Moralism is not enough to support a politician. Even if you prove that Mitt Romney is a moral man, that is not enough, if Mitt's Theology is anti-Christian.

Apostle Paul would have not supported for civil office those Jews that contradicted and opposed Christianity.






.............

Paul Krugman : Mitt Romney is a closet Keynesian : a gaffe is when a politician accidently tells the truth. That happened to Mitt Romney on Tuesday, when in a very rare moment of candor he gave away the game. Mitt is the champion of insincerity and verbal dishonesty

.
Mitt Romney said : “If you just cut, if all you’re thinking about doing is cutting spending, as you cut spending you’ll slow down the economy.”


The New York Times
Romney’s Economic Closet
By PAUL KRUGMAN
February 23, 2012

Romney’s Economic Closet

Some excerpts :

Speaking in Michigan, Mr. Romney was asked about deficit reduction, and he absent-mindedly said something completely reasonable: “If you just cut, if all you’re thinking about doing is cutting spending, as you cut spending you’ll slow down the economy.” A-ha. So he believes that cutting government spending hurts growth, other things equal.
.................

Mr. Romney is not a stupid man. And while his grasp of world affairs does sometimes seem shaky, he has to be aware of the havoc austerity policies are wreaking in Greece, Ireland and elsewhere.

Beyond that, we know who he turns to for economic advice; heading the list are Glenn Hubbard of Columbia University and N. Gregory Mankiw of Harvard. While both men are loyal Republican spear-carriers — each served for a time as chairman of George W. Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers — both also have long track records as professional economists. And what these track records suggest is that neither of them believes any of the propositions that have become litmus tests for would-be G.O.P. presidential candidates.

Consider Mr. Mankiw, in particular. Modern Republicans detest Keynes; Mr. Mankiw is the editor of a collection of papers titled “New Keynesian Economics.” In an early edition of his best-selling textbook, he dismissed supply-side economics — the doctrine embraced by the sainted Ronald Reagan — as the creation of “charlatans and cranks.” And, in 2009, he called for higher inflation as a solution to the economic crisis, a position anathema to Republicans like Representative Paul Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, who warn ominously about the evil of “debasing” our currency.

Given his advisers, then, it seems safe to assume that what Mr. Romney blurted out Tuesday reflected his real economic beliefs — as opposed to the nonsense he pretends to believe, because it’s what the Republican base wants to hear.
.................

As I see it, it comes down to the cynicism underlying the whole enterprise. Once you’ve decided to hide your beliefs and say whatever you think will get you the nomination, to pretend to agree with people you privately believe are fools, why worry at all about truth?

What this diagnosis implies, of course, is that the many people on the right who don’t trust Mr. Romney, who don’t believe that he’s truly committed to their political faith, are correct in their suspicions. He’s playing a role, and it’s anyone’s guess what lies beneath the mask.
...............

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Michael Scherer wrote the last Time Magazine Cover Story "Why Latinos will pick the next President". Who is MS ? - TIME Magazine was created in 1923 and was the first weekly news magazine in the United States. Time is the world's largest circulation weekly news magazine with a readership of 25 million, of which 20 million are in the US

.


Time has now journalism of boldness, audacity and bravery like author Michael Scherer.  The last cover story of Time : "Why Latinos will pick the next President" show boldness and imagination, and I think that it is reasonable, even if nobody knows the future for sure.

I would suggest that the Democratic Party uses the magazine as a selling tool to recruit Latinos to vote for President Obama on November 6, 2012. Every salesman knows that magazines, newspapers, etc provide a great selling point, a fulcrum or support point to use a selling lever. ( like Greek Scientist Archimedes that wanted to move the world with a lever ).

If Democratic canvassers in Swing States with sizable Latino Populations show the magazine cover and article to Latino Voters, that would perform miracles to persuade them to vote.


I read TIME since I was a child, and it probably has helped me to believe in Liberal Ideals and protected me from conservative sophistry.



Who is Michael Scherer ??

Michael Scherer is TIME’s White House correspondent and is a regular contributor to TIME.com’s political blog, Swampland. He joined TIME in December 2007 and was named White House correspondent in January 2009.

Previously, Scherer was TIME’s Washington correspondent, a role in which he covered general politics and the 2008 campaign, during which he traveled extensively with Sen. John McCain.

Before joining TIME, Scherer was the Washington correspondent for Salon.com, where he covered politics and elections. Before joining Salon, Scherer was a Washington correspondent for Mother Jones, an assistant editor at the Columbia Journalism Review and an education reporter for the Daily Hampshire Gazette (Northampton, Mass.). His work has also appeared in Rolling Stone and The Nation.

Scherer received an M.S. from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and his B.A. from the University of California at Santa Cruz.



The History of TIME Magazine in Wikipedia


Some excerpts :

Time (trademarked in capitals as TIME) is an American weekly news magazine published in New York City. Time is the world's largest circulation weekly news magazine with a readership of 25 million, of which 20 million are in the US. Richard Stengel has been the managing editor since 2006.

Time magazine was created in 1923 by Briton Hadden and Henry Luce, making it the first weekly news magazine in the United States.[4] The two had previously worked together as chairman and managing editor respectively of the Yale Daily News and considered calling the magazine Facts.[5] Hadden was a rather carefree figure, who liked to tease Luce and saw Time as something important but also fun. That accounts for its tone, which many people still criticize as too light for serious news and more suited to its heavy coverage of celebrities (including politicians), the entertainment industry, and pop culture. It set out to tell the news through people, and for many decades the magazine's cover was of a single person. The first issue of Time was published on March 3, 1923, featuring on its cover Joseph G. Cannon, the retired Speaker of the United States House of Representatives; a facsimile reprint of Issue No. 1, including all of the articles and advertisements contained in the original, was included with copies of the February 28, 1938 issue as a commemoration of the magazine's 15th anniversary.[6] On Hadden's death in 1929, Luce became the dominant man at Time and a major figure in the history of 20th-century media. According to Time Inc.: The Intimate History of a Publishing Enterprise 1972–2004 by Robert Elson, "Roy Edward Larsen [...] was to play a role second only to Luce's in the development of Time Inc." In his book, The March of Time, 1935–1951, Raymond Fielding also noted that Larsen was "originally circulation manager and then general manager of Time, later publisher of Life, for many years president of Time, Inc., and in the long history of the corporation the most influential and important figure after Luce."

Around the time they were raising US$100,000 from wealthy Yale alumni like Henry P. Davison, partner of J.P. Morgan & Co., publicity man Martin Egan and J.P. Morgan & Co. banker Dwight Morrow, Henry Luce and Briton Hadden hired Larsen in 1922 – although Larsen was a Harvard graduate and Luce and Hadden were Yale graduates. After Hadden died in 1929, Larsen purchased 550 shares of Time Inc., using money he obtained from selling RKO stock which he had inherited from his father, who was the head of the B.F. Keith theatre chain in New England. However, after Briton Hadden's death, the largest Time Inc. stockholder was Henry Luce, who ruled the media conglomerate in an autocratic fashion, "at his right hand was Larsen," Time Inc.'s second-largest stockholder, according to "Time Inc.: The Intimate History of a Publishing Enterprise 1923–1941". In 1929, Roy Larsen was also named a Time Inc. director and a Time Inc. vice-president. J.P. Morgan retained a certain control through two directorates and a share of stocks, both over Time and Fortune. Other shareholders were Brown Brothers W. A. Harriman & Co., and The New York Trust Company (Standard Oil).

By the time of Henry Luce's death in 1967, the Time Inc. stock which Luce owned was worth about US$109 million and yielded him a yearly dividend income of more than US$2.4 million, according to The World of Time Inc: The Intimate History Of A Changing Enterprise 1960–1989 by Curtis Prendergast. The value of the Larsen family's Time Inc. stock was now worth about $80 million during the 1960s and Roy Larsen was both a Time Inc. director and the chairman of its Executive Committee, before serving as Time Inc.'s vice-chairman of the board until the middle of 1979. According to the September 10, 1979 issue of The New York Times, "Mr. Larsen was the only employee in the company's history given an exemption from its policy of mandatory retirement at age 65."

After Time magazine began publishing its weekly issues in March 1923, Roy Larsen was able to increase its circulation by utilizing U.S. radio and movie theaters around the world. It often promoted both "Time" magazine and U.S. political and corporate interests. According to The March of Time, as early as 1924, Larsen had brought Time into the infant radio business with the broadcast of a 15-minute sustaining quiz show entitled Pop Question which survived until 1925." Then, according to the same book, "In 1928 [...] Larsen undertook the weekly broadcast of a 10-minute programme series of brief news summaries, drawn from current issues of Time magazine [...] which was originally broadcast over 33 stations throughout the United States."

Larsen next arranged for a 30-minute radio programme, The March of Time, to be broadcast over CBS, beginning on March 6, 1931. Each week, the programme presented a dramatisation of the week's news for its listeners, thus Time magazine itself was brought "to the attention of millions previously unaware of its existence," according to Time Inc.: The Intimate History Of A Publishing Enterprise 1923–1941, leading to an increased circulation of the magazine during the 1930s. Between 1931 and 1937, Larsen's The March of Time radio programme was broadcast over CBS radio and between 1937 and 1945 it was broadcast over NBC radio – except for the 1939 to 1941 period when it was not aired. People Magazine was based on Time's People page.

In July 1976, Parveen Babi was featured on Time Magazine's cover, which helped change the image of the Indian Film Heroine.

Time became part of Time Warner in 1989, along with Warner Bros. when Time, Inc. and Warner Communications merged. Jason McManus succeeded Henry Grunwald in 1988 as Editor-in-Chief and oversaw the transition before Norman Pearlstine succeeded him in 1995.

Since 2000, the magazine has been part of AOL Time Warner, which subsequently reverted to the name Time Warner in 2003.

In 2007, Time moved from a Monday subscription/newsstand delivery to a schedule where the magazine goes on sale Fridays, and is delivered to subscribers on Saturday. The magazine actually began in 1923 with Friday publication.

During early 2007, the year's first issue was delayed for roughly a week due to "editorial changes." The changes included the job losses of 49 employees.

In 2009 Time announced that they were introducing a personalised print magazine, Mine, mixing content from a range of Time Warner publications based on the reader's preferences. The new magazine met with a poor reception, with criticism that its focus was too broad to be truly personal.

The magazine has an online archive with the unformatted text for every article published. The articles are indexed and were converted from scanned images using optical character recognition technology. There are still minor errors in the text that are remnants of the conversion into digital format.
.......

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Time Magazine Cover Story : Michael Scherer : "Why Latinos will pick the next President" : "Why the Latino Vote in Arizona Could Be Decisive in 2012" : "A backlash led by the growing Latino community can turn Arizona into a new presidential battleground in 2012"

.
"If Obama is able to win heavily-Latino Western states like Nevada, Colorado and Arizona, he could still win in the electoral college even if he loses historically key states in the industrial Midwest like Ohio and Wisconsin"


Time Magazine Cover Story
Why the Latino Vote in Arizona Could Be Decisive in 2012
By Michael Scherer
February 22, 2012

Why the Latino Vote in Arizona Could Be Decisive in 2012

Some excerpts ;

Consider it an awkward coincidence: The final Republican debate before the Super Tuesday primary is taking place in Arizona, at the epicenter of the national immigration debate. When the remaining four candidates take the stage on Wednesday night, they will inevitably be asked about the state’s tough crackdown on illegal immigration, which has defined the local Republican Party in recent years, buoyed the hopes of local Democrats and been condemned by, among others, the U.S. Department of Justice. The candidates will have to answer carefully.

Though the GOP base in Arizona is still roiled by the influx of undocumented immigrants into the state, the Obama campaign is betting that a backlash led by the growing Latino community can turn Arizona into a new presidential battleground in 2012. This is the subject of my cover story in the new issue of TIME, available online to subscribers Thursday and on newsstands Friday. For the cover, photographer Marco Grob traveled to Arizona to shoot an amazing gallery of portraits of Latino voters.

In the coming weeks, the Obama campaign will open its fourth field office in Arizona, a state no Democrat has won since Bill Clinton and which native-son John McCain won in 2008 by nine points. The location of the office, a storefront on Phoenix’s majority-Latino west side, matters. Just a few months ago, it was used by campaign volunteers for Daniel Valenzuela, a local firefighter, who mounted an underdog bid for the City Council on the theory that he could turn out Latino voters who don’t normally vote. He won big in 2011, as did the new Democratic mayor in Phoenix, Greg Stanton.

A group of young people calling themselves “Team Awesome” knocked on 72,000 doors in the city to support Valenzuela’s bid. They increased off-year turnout among the Latino community by 480%, more than delivering Valenzuela’s margin of victory. “There is a ripple effect that has the city and the county and the state of Arizona looking at the way they approach politics,” says Joseph Larios, 29, a community organizer now working with the state Democratic Party who helped Valenzuela develop his strategy. “It’s impossible to say going after low-propensity Latino voters doesn’t matter based on what happened.”

For the Obama campaign nationwide, “expanding the electorate” increasingly means “expanding the Latino electorate.” If Obama is able to win heavily-Latino Western states like Nevada, Colorado and Arizona, he could still win in the electoral college even if he loses historically key states in the industrial Midwest like Ohio and Wisconsin. “If we do our grassroots stuff right on the ground in all these Western states, which we will, because it’s something we are good at,” Obama campaign manager Jim Messina told me, “we could seriously change the outcome.”
...........

VIDEO, Ed Schultz talks with U.S. Rep. Gary Peters, Democrat, Michigan : The grave failure of Mitt Romney in the rescue of the Car Makers - The foolishness of Romney that opposed the successful recovery of the Auto Industry

.
This episode shows that Mitt Romney lacks instinct and intuition in economic matters, he is a brutal ideologue, married to impractical theories. Exactly the opposite to the President, Obama is a man of vision.

Uploaded by PetersForCongress on Feb 14, 2012

U.S. Rep. Gary Peters holds Mitt Romney accountable for wanting to "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt" on MSNBC's The Ed Show


U.S. Rep. Gary Peters takes on Mitt Romney over auto rescue package on MSNBC's The Ed Show




***************************

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

POLITICO.COM : Dow tops 13,000 mark : the first time it has done so since the 2008 financial crisis - Greek bailout deal - a $172 billion rescue plan, fairly strong job creation over the last few months, and Congress’ passage of a payroll tax holiday extension

.
"Early trading pushed the Dow Jones into territory not seen in nearly four years. The index last traded above 13,000 points on May 20, 2008".
........

"The DJIA opened at 12,949.34 on Tuesday, crossed the 13,000 line, dropped down slightly below that mark shortly after".
..........




POLITICO.COM
Dow tops 13,000 mark
By TIM MAK
February 21, 2012


Dow tops 13,000 mark


*********************

Dow Jones Industrial Index in 12988.02. breaking 13,000 soon today - NASDAQ in 2,961 and soon to break 3,000 - Standards and Poor in 1,365 - Please all Wall Streeters and Investors kneel on the floor of New York Stocks Exchange and thank God for President Obama

..
I have said so - Ditto Ditto Ditto - He Dicho !!  -- Roma Locuta Est, Cause Finita - All words are superfluous when President Obama has saved America and the World of a Big Depression and now the bulls are running like mad, like in the San Fermin Fiesta of Pamplona Spain.
......

Monday, February 20, 2012

The New Republic : "A new marketing campaign or a clever slogan cannot save a dog food that the dogs don’t like. So too is it with the Romney campaign. At this point, his only hope is to prevail by using about the oldest argument in politics: “The other guys are worse.”"

.
"And considering the caliber of his opponents (the Three Horsemen of the Republican Apocalypse), Mitt Romney may just get away with it in the primary. But this is not the stuff that promising general election campaigns are made of".


The New Republic
Why Mitt Romney's Presidential Prospects May Not Be Salvageable
By Walter Shapiro
February 20, 2012

Why Mitt Romney's Presidential Prospects May Not Be Salvageable


Some excerpts :

Business School Case Study: Company R has the financial resources, the professional staff, the marketing know-how, and the business expertise to dominate its competition. But despite the near-universal familiarity of its signature product, Company R has been dramatically losing market share to upstart challenger Company S, which until recently was little-noticed outside of rural Iowa.

Company R is obviously due for a major re-branding. But there is a major obstacle—Company R has changed its marketing strategy so often in the last decade that consumers have no clear idea what makes it distinctive. Asked to describe Company R’s positive attributes, focus-group participants constantly say things like “It’s rich” and “It’s safe” and “It’s there.”

Because Company R’s sales are plunging in Michigan, the state where it got its start, the futures markets are shorting the stock. Suddenly, a total collapse seems possible. Assignment: Prepare a PowerPoint showing how you would execute a rapid-fire turnaround.
.............

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Obamacare is identical to Romneycare : Both have an individual mandate; both have an employer mandate. The Romneycare employer mandate is more rigorous because it applies to small businesses and other organizations that employ 10 or more people rather than 50 or more

.
“Both mandate the use of electronic health records. In fact, once again Romneycare is tougher because physicians actually lose their license to practice if they don’t comply,”

“Both have comparative effectiveness and both dictate how doctors treat patients. Both have end of life programs.




WND.COM
World Net Weekly
Is Obamacare just Romneycare 2.0 ?
Sunday, February 19, 2012

by Michael Carl
Michael Carl is a veteran journalist with overseas military experience and experience as a political consultant. He also has two Master's Degrees, is a bi-vocational pastor and lives with his family in the Northeast United States.


Is Obamacare just Romneycare 2.0 ?



************************

Saturday, February 18, 2012

Obama is not a believer in budget cuts and austerity to pull the country out of the worst economic downturn since the Depression. He thinks he has the public behind him in arguing that job creation, training, education and research outweigh deficit reduction as the top priority

.
The proposed Presidential Budget tells a lot about who Obama is and what is his Government Program for the next years. It is the right direction for the country.


San Francisco Chronicle
Editorial
Obama's 2012 budget looks risky but is right move
Friday, February 17, 2012


Obama's 2012 budget looks risky but is right move


Some excerpts :

President Obama is banking on his revived popularity to sell his next federal budget: a $3.8 trillion package that raises taxes on the wealthy, nicks defense spending and pushes through a handful of stimulus-style economic programs. It's a risky path that hinges on his re-election, but it's also the right direction for the country.
..............

To answer worries about the spreading red ink, Obama says future years will see smaller deficits, especially if higher taxes on the wealthy kick in and the economy revives. It's a confident belief in the future, but it's by no means guaranteed.

If that sounds risky, consider the alternative : deep cuts in domestic spending, a lopsided tax system and nonstop ridicule of government, all hallmarks of the Republican outlook. Voters briefly warmed to this outlook two years ago, giving the GOP control of the House. But since then, the nation's been treated to standoffs and dysfunction that have discredited Republicans. This week, the GOP-led House agreed to an extension of a payroll tax cut pushed by Democrats, a clear sign that Republican leaders worry about their nay-saying image.

A budget plan is usually a careful document layered with dollar signs and program titles. But it's also a political blueprint that speaks volumes about its author's goals and beliefs. This budget should serve Obama well in pushing his agenda.
.........

VIDEO, Ed Schultz, Mike Papantonio compares Mitt Romney to the "Truman Show" with Comedian Jim Carey as Truman Burbank. Truman is unaware that he is living in a constructed reality television show - Mitt Romney and the Republicans are Trumans

.
Cross Burners in White Sheets :

The Truman Show has been analyzed as a thesis on Christianity, simulated reality, existentialism and the rise of reality television. Mitt Romney is living in a Delusional World where he is the super businessman and super man that fixes America overnight, and he is the delusional hero that combats the 666 beast, the anti-Christ Barack Obama.

The problem is that Mitt is not even a mainstream Christian but a Mormon, a Religion that denies the main theological points of 2,000 years of Christianity. And his hypocrisy, opportunism and lies have gone so far that he has undergone contagion with delusion and is out of reality, but he is in a show with millions of spectators and fans.

Ed Schultz tells many funny but painful realities about the Republican Party, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum.


The Truman Show is a 1998 American satirical comedy-drama film directed by Peter Weir and written by Andrew Niccol. The cast includes Jim Carrey as Truman Burbank. The film chronicles the life of a man who is initially unaware that he is living in a constructed reality television show, broadcast 24-hours-a-day to billions of people across the globe. Truman becomes suspicious of his perceived reality and embarks on a quest to discover the truth about his life.


Papantonio: GOP Has Buyer's Remorse With Presidential Candidates

Uploaded by golefttv on Feb 13, 2012

Mike Papantonio and Ed Schultz discuss the GOP's dissatisfaction with their current crop of presidential candidates -- candidates that have already been bought and paid for, so there's no turning back.




********************************

Friday, February 17, 2012

VIDEO, Romney Running Out Of Gas In Michigan and losing in his native state. Santorum 33%, Romney 27% - "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt" : headline on a New York Times opinion piece Mitt Romney wrote in late 2008, arguing against a U.S. taxpayer bailout of America's iconic auto industry

.

CNN VIDEO, LZ Granderson, CNN Contributor, ESPN.COM Sr. Writer.

Uploaded by MrObamanos on Feb 17, 2012

Let Detroit Go Bankrupt.

That was the headline on a New York Times opinion piece Mitt Romney wrote in late 2008, arguing against a U.S. taxpayer bailout of America's iconic auto industry.

It was a tough-love message from the son of a former Michigan governor, a made-in-Detroit politician who felt government intervention "virtually guaranteed" the demise of Chrysler and General Motors.

Fast forward almost four years. The carmakers are making money again and Romney is the one in trouble - unexpectedly battling Rick Santo-rum ahead of Michigan's Republican presidential primary on Feb. 28.

Romney launched a major effort Tuesday to rescue his campaign in the Great Lakes State, amid concerns that defeat there is not only possible, but potentially crippling to his White House ambitions.

"The Romney people know they are in some trouble here," says Matt Grossmann, a political scientist at Michigan State University.

The save-Michigan strategy includes a new television ad touting Romney's family ties to the auto industry and a bid to clarify the reasons he opposed the $85-billion US bailout for Chrysler and GM.

Romney's super PAC, Restore our Future, is supplementing the candidate's effort with its own $640,000 ad buy - further evidence the former Massachusetts governor's allies think his campaign is sputtering in Michigan.

"A loss in Michigan would be the most devastating blow yet to Romney's candidacy," says Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia. "He grew up there, his father was governor, and he won the state four years ago. There is just no way Romney could spin this defeat to minimize it."

The new Michigan TV ad shows Romney behind the wheel of a Chrysler and features footage of classic Detroit cars. The candidate reminiscences about attending the Detroit auto show with his father, George, who was chief executive of American Motors in the 1950s and early 1960s. Romney was born in Detroit and his father was governor of Michigan from 1963-69.

In a separate opinion piece published in Tuesday's Detroit News, Romney says he opposed the Obama administration's bailout of Chrysler and General Motors because it was "crony capitalism" that amounted to "an $85-billion sweetheart deal" for auto unions at the expense of company creditors.

"The indisputable good news is that Chrysler and General Motors are still in business," Romney writes. "The equally indisputable bad news is that all the defects in President (Barack) Obama's management of the American economy are evident in what he did."

The ad and article are aimed at Re-publican primary voters, who polls show are warming to Santorum.

The former Pennsylvania governor, who won nominating contests last week in Colorado, Missouri and Minnesota, has emphasized his own blue-collar roots and championed the need for a rebirth of American manufacturing.

A Rasmussen Reports poll on Feb. 13 showed Santorum with a three-point lead over Romney in Michigan. A separate Public Policy Polling survey found a wider Santorum advantage. Nationally, a New York Times/ CBS News poll on Tuesday showed Santorum with 30-per-cent support and Romney with 27 per cent.

While Romney has one eye on Santorum, he appears also to be targeting independent voters whose sup-port he will need to make Michigan competitive in November if he wins the GOP nomination.

Obama's campaign has repeatedly attacked Romney for opposing the auto industry bailout, saying "there would not be an American auto industry" if the former Massachusetts governor had been in the White House.

Romney Running Out Of Gas In Michigan



***********************

William Galston : Obama’s reelection prospects have brightened considerably because Americans now believe their country’s economic health is improving. Obama’s re-election will depend on whether they continue believing so in the nine months until election day

.
The New Republic
The Obama Campaign Has Momentum, But Can It Keep It?
February 16, 2012

By William Galston
William Galston is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a contributing editor at The New Republic.

The Obama Campaign Has Momentum, But Can It Keep It?

Some excerpts :

It turns out that the American public is an exquisitely sensitive barometer of real economic developments. Between January and September of 2011, job creation ranged from anemic to imperceptible, the number of unemployed Americans didn’t budge, and neither did the unemployment rate. Since then, the number of employed Americans has risen by 1.5 million, the number of unemployed has declined by more than 1.2 million, and the unemployment rate has declined from 9.0 to 8.3 percent. If these trends continue at this pace for the next nine months, Obama will be sworn in for a second term.

Still, as so often happens, the consensus has shifted too abruptly, moving from “Obama’s toast” to “none of these bums can beat him.” Obama’s chances may have improved, but 2012 is still a close race and will remain so unless the economy outperforms most expectations.
................

The bottom line: Romney is bloodied but not mortally wounded, while the president is doing better but is not yet out of danger. And despite Santorum’s rapid rise, which could lead to his nomination if he prevails in Michigan, the evidence currently available does not sustain what is becoming the core argument of his primary campaign—that in the industrial Midwest, his alleged blue-collar appeal would make him a stronger general election candidate than Romney against Obama. Romney and Obama as favorites, Santorum as a long-shot: The overall political situation has changed since last fall, but not as much as many people think. In the minds of swing voters, the economy will still be the deciding factor.
............

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Ezra Klein : "The legislation Obama has already signed into law is far greater in scope and ambition than anything he has subsequently proposed, or is likely to pass. For Obama’s presidency to be remembered as one of the most consequential in recent American history, he does not need a new strategy, or a new personality."

.
"He simply needs to win a second term so that he can protect the accomplishments of his first".



Washington Post
The best way to judge Obama’s first term — and his second
By Ezra Klein
February 12, 2012


The best way to judge Obama’s first term — and his second


Some excerpts :

The most important fact of Obama’s reelection campaign is that, if he wins, the single most important accomplishment of his second term will be protecting the gains of his first term. If he wins, the Affordable Care Act — barring a truly unexpected ruling from the Supreme Court — becomes the law of the land. If he wins, Dodd-Frank becomes the law on Wall Street. If he loses, both policies are likely to be either rolled back or hollowed out. Bush’s victory in the Gulf War withstood Bill Clinton’s election, and the Camp David agreement was not undone by Ronald Reagan. In Obama’s case, however, a failure to win a second term will not just color his accomplishments. It will decide their fate.

Moreover, if Obama did win a second term his accomplishments would be comparatively limited. He will not enjoy anything like the congressional majorities of his first two years again. He is likely to face a Republican House or a Republican Senate or both. What he can accomplish in terms of new legislation will thus depend on how much congressional Republicans want him to accomplish in terms of new legislation. Though there’s some reason to believe that losing the 2012 election could empower more moderate factions in the GOP, anything beyond modest levels of cooperation would remain unlikely. Divided government is not the place for miracles. As such, it’s likely to be the legislation from Obama’s first term that decides his legacy and holds the most hope of addressing the country’s toughest policy problems.
...........

We also know what Obama wants to do. Raise taxes on the wealthy. Invest in infrastructure. Address climate change. Reduce the deficit, albeit on a more gradual path than many Republicans say they would prefer. Roll back Citizens United. End the war in Afghanistan. And, perhaps most importantly, entrench the major pieces of legislation passed in his first term.
...........

Great Information of CNN/Census Bureau about number of Latinos in the 15 key Swing States, Data, Information, Electoral Votes, Margins of Victory of Barack Obama or John McCain

.
Jeb Bush recently wrote that Hispanic voters will represent the margin of victory in the 15 swing states that will decide in November 2012 - Obama won North Carolina by only 14,177 votes. Since then, Hispanic voter registration in North Carolina has nearly doubled to 130,615.

Please note that this information of the Census Bureau is "Old" and "Outdated" .... Today's Numbers of possible Latino Voting Age Population should be higher.

CNN
February 12, 2012
Will Hispanic voters swing the 2012 race?
Source CNN Political Research Team and U. S. Bureau of Census
Charles Garcia of GarcĂ­a Trujillo Marketing Business

Editor's note: Charles Garcia is the CEO of Garcia Trujillo, a business focused on the Hispanic market, and the author of "Leadership Lessons of the White House Fellows." A native of the Republic of Panama, he now lives in Florida. Watch Garcia on Friday in the 9 a.m. hour on CNN Newsroom.


Will Hispanic voters swing the 2012 race?


First Column is Change in Latino Voting Age Population
Second Column is Electoral Votes of the State
Third Column is Margin or Excess Of Obama Victory Votes


                                    Change              Electoral       Margin of Obama Victory

Arizona                     ( 35,254 )              11                  ( 195,404 )
Colorado                     21,358                  9                     214,987
Florida                      384,707                 29                     236,450
Indiana                        34,189                11                       28,391
Iowa                            15,115                   6                     146,561
Michigan                      4,967                 16                     823,940
Missouri                     17,846                 10                     ( 3,903 )
Nevada                      38,039                    6                    120,909
New Hampshire          1,852                    4                     68,292
New Mexico             34,746                     5                   125,590
North Carolina          78,043                  15                     14,177
Ohio                           33,961                  18                   258,897
Pennsylvania             88,656                  20                   620,478
Virginia                      73,986                  13                  234,527
Wisconsin                   24,721                 10                  414,818

Total                        716,933                  163               3,507,324



..................

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

"If you would have told the average liberal four years ago that their president would pass health care reform, repeal don’t ask/don’t tell, end the war in Iraq, and start downsizing the Pentagon—and that, after all that, Obama would still be in a strong position to win re-election

.
.. they would probably have taken the deal. The process was messy and endlessly frustrating, but it got to the right place"

And add the killing of Osama Bin Laden !


The New Republic
In Which I Question Obama’s “Long-Game” Strategy
By Noam Scheiber
February 14, 2012


In Which I Question Obama’s “Long-Game” Strategy


Some excerpts :

But this logic breaks down as it relates to the economy. When it comes to the economy, you can’t simply tell people not to worry about three years of punishingly high unemployment because it worked out in the end. Those were still three years of punishingly high unemployment, and they were absolutely miserable for the large number of people who couldn’t provide for their families, or who worried they wouldn’t be able to.

Worse, if you buy Andrew’s long-game argument, some otherwise avoidable amount of pain was actually necessary. In order for the rope-a-dope strategy to work, after all, you have to patiently absorb a lot of blows—blows you otherwise would have countered—before you make your move and reclaim the initiative. As a practical matter, those blows came when the administration was either too preoccupied with deficit-reduction, not focused enough on getting more stimulus, or both. (Obviously, the hundreds of billions in stimulus Obama did procure was enormously helpful. But he missed opportunities for more, both in the original Recovery Act and later on.

So, yes, Obama’s long-game appears to have worked politically, to the extent that it was a conscious strategy. But substantively, it left something to be desired. And, in the end, a president has to be judged on both counts.
.....

SALON.COM : Repeat of History : Bill Clinton defeated Bob Dole in 1996 - Supertitious, Supernatural, Mysterious resemblance to the 2012 contest between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney - Cauldron of Witches

..
SALON.COM
The GOP’s emerging Bob Dole problem
The last Republican to take on a Democratic president never recovered from his primary season wounds
By Steve Kornacki
Wednesday, February 15, 2012

The GOP’s emerging Bob Dole problem


Some excerpts :

Like Obama, Bill Clinton began the 1996 cycle on the heels of an epic midterm election defeat and with the opposition party convinced it had found the formula to defeat him. But the Republican Party’s image plunged in 1995 and early ’96, the product of overreach by its new congressional majority and the toxic antics of a House speaker named Newt Gingrich, while the economy — and Clinton’s approval scores — improved. By the time Bob Dole, who suffered an embarrassing series of early primary season defeats (including to Pat Buchanan in New Hampshire), finally secured the GOP nomination he was running far behind Clinton. And despite predictions throughout the spring of ’96 that the race would ultimately tighten, it never really did.

After his defeat, Dole was known to lament that the election had come two years too late. Obama’s recent gains are tenuous, but it seems a lot more likely now than it did a few months ago that the 2012 Republican nominee will end up saying the same thing.
............

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Obama's New Budget : To favor college kids ( He won this demographic in 2008 by an extraordinary margin ) - Obama to help community colleges, financial aid and tax credits for them and their students. Loans for undergraduate students

.
Obama campaign’s attempts to rally the middle class, a narrative of shared responsibility including adequate taxation of the rich that are now in a wonderful paradise of extremely low taxes.

This is a proposal to strongly help American Youngsters in their Education, and to help the Middle Class and the Real Small Businesses that are creating Real Jobs. And not falling in the delusions and traps of the discredited "Trickle Down Economics" ( that is giving money to the rich, allegedly to help the Poor )



POLITICO.COM
President Obama's budget targets key voters
By CARRIE BUDOFF BROWN
Februaryh 14, 2012


President Obama's budget targets key voters

Some excerpts :

Families that earn more than $250,000 aren’t in the clear, despite the efforts of some leading congressional Democrats to raise the threshold for new taxes to the more politically palatable $1 million mark.

It turns out that Obama doesn’t just want to eliminate the Bush-era tax cuts for these upper-income families and limit the amount of charitable deductions they can take — two ideas he renews in the budget.

He also proposed taxing dividends as ordinary income, raising the top rate to 39.6 percent from 15 percent. It was a move that surprised analysts because he hasn’t advocated such a high rate in the past.
...........

“We simply can’t afford to devote $206 billion for lower tax rates for the highest-income Americans,” Gene Sperling, White House director of the National Economic Council, told reporters Monday. “Our system for taxing investment income for the most well-off Americans is clearly broken.”
...........

And Obama went to bat once again for teachers and first responders — two more key allies — by renewing his call for $30 billion to prevent layoffs at the state and local levels.
..............

But Obama and his team made a strategic decision months ago to put the deficit second to job creation — and it has served them well politically if not fiscally, as the unemployment rate has declined to its lowest level in three years.
...........

Play to the Rust Belt

Obama continues his play for the industrial Midwest and mid-Atlantic regions — crucial battlegrounds — with a series of tax incentives aimed at manufacturers.

Manufacturers that create jobs at home? They get a tax break. Communities affected by manufacturing job losses? They get $6 billion in targeted assistance. Companies that pursue advanced manufacturing? They get double the amount of deductions.
...............

Big banks face a $61 billion tax, which is doubled from last year and would help fund the president’s mortgage refinancing program. The financial services industry doesn’t like Obama’s Buffett Rule for a minimum 30 percent tax rate for millionaires, or his plan to hike taxes on dividends for the wealthy, or his promises to raise the carried interest rate that targets private equity and hedge fund managers. Oil and gas companies risk losing $41 billion in subsidies.

The initiatives play well with progressives, tap into the anger harnessed by the Occupy Wall Street movement and box in Republicans, particularly Romney, as defenders of the wealthy and corporations.

“With full knowledge that this will not pass or there will not be a deal, Obama is using the budget document to set up a very popular argument in the election campaign,” said Roger Hickey, co-director of the Campaign for America’s Future, a progressive advocacy group.
.........

Monday, February 13, 2012

POLITICO.COM : Derail Mitt Romney : "Rick Santorum’s campaign is eyeing a pair of swiftly approaching Midwestern primary states as its best — and perhaps only — opportunity to deal a mortal blow to Mitt Romney and permanently transform the Republican presidential race into a one-on-one duel to the finish"

.
"Rick Santorum's team sees plentiful opportunities to harvest delegates over the next month in states such as North Dakota, Oklahoma and Kansas — inexpensive political arenas that lean strongly to the right".



POLITICO.COM
Rick Santorum’s plan to derail Mitt Romney
By ALEXANDER BURNS and MAGGIE HABERMAN
February 13, 2012

Rick Santorum’s plan to derail Mitt Romney

Some excerpts :

A potential path to breaking open the race against Romney, they say, could run through Michigan’s Feb. 28 election and Ohio’s Super Tuesday vote on March 6 — two Rust Belt primaries in which they believe Santorum’s working-class background and manufacturing-heavy message will resonate. (Arizona’s winner-take-all primary, also on Feb. 28, looks less inviting.)

The privately held hope in the Santorum camp is that beating Romney in his native state of Michigan or in the ultimate general election battleground of Ohio would discredit, on a grand scale, the on-and-off Republican front-runner and make the other candidates in the race irrelevant in the remaining contests.
...................

“A state like Michigan, a state like Ohio, you do look at those and say, Santorum’s blue-collar background versus Romney’s Wall Street background, we believe is a great contrast to have.”

Santorum himself went a bit further in a Fox News interview last week, saying he believed he could beat Romney in Michigan, though Romney won the state in 2008 and grew up there when his father, George Romney, was governor.

And even as they work to lay the foundation for a longer struggle against Romney, Santorum’s team has already taken tentative steps toward a more aggressive posture in Michigan and Ohio.

They’ve brought on state directors in both states, plus Tennessee. A media-buying source said Santorum has inquired about cable television rates in Ohio and aides to the former senator said they are preparing to run ads there and in Michigan.
..............

More than a few of the Super Tuesday states fit that bill: Santorum campaigned last week in Oklahoma and is scheduled to visit Idaho and North Dakota in the next few days. Should Santorum fall short against Romney in the big-ticket Midwestern battlegrounds, his advisers believe he could press on with a campaign aimed at building a conservative coalition, delegate by delegate, for the Tampa convention.

-----------------

The other theory of the case, however, is that Santorum’s surge is proof positive that the Republican Party simply does not want to nominate Romney for president. Maybe (and even proponents of the theory acknowledge it’s only a maybe) Santorum’s sweep of last Tuesday’s primaries tore up the expectation among primary voters that the GOP will settle on Romney and created an opening for Santorum to knock him off.
..................

“I think he’s going to win Tennessee. He’s not going to win Georgia, but in states where there’s large evangelical populations, where they don’t have a native son running, I think he’s going to do well. I think he’s going to win Oklahoma,” said Land, who is neutral in the race. “He has won the battle with Newt Gingrich for the social conservative vote.”
.............

“I think you might actually see, because of the Tuesday election, exponential growth in the Santorum camp,” the Santorum ally said. “People have paid attention but didn’t think he could win.”
.............

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Republicans are creating a magic mentality, Obama bad guy, Mitt Romney Superman fixes everything overnight with his superpowers of a super genius. In fact dismembering corporations and firing people is not a good preparation to be president

.
It is topmost in naivete to believe that Obama and his aides are incompetent fools that do not know how to fix the economy and that Mitt Romney is a Superhero of Economics that will fix everything with his super intelligence.

The Big Harm of Republicans to the Economy during the 8 years of George W. Bush are not easily repaired in a year or two.

Naivete is credulousness, gullibility - tendency to believe too readily and therefore to be easily deceived - and the Republican voters in the primaries are champions of this horrible defect, being extremely innocent to fall into traps of sophistry and deceit.

Just because Mitt Romney says something with lots of self-assurance, the topic or sentence does not have to be true. Remember that he was a "Mormon Missionary" and he thus acquired a lot of shrewdness to deceive fools. He is a great actor and histrionic and can easily wear two masks : that is the etymology and definition of Hypocrite, a Greek Word that means the mask of an actor. It also means lack of character and value.

The "Free Dictionary" also defines "Naivete" as "simple mindedness, simpleness, simplicity - a lack of penetration or subtlety".

Mitt Romney buys a corporation in Bain Capital. Mitt is a pink-slipper, he gives pink slips to people in that corporation to fire them from their jobs. Later he can sell the assets of the wounded corporation at a better price.

Is he going to sell America Incorporated and fire all his employees and workers ??

I agree that Mitt Romney is a great speculator and has lots of shrewdness to hide gains and profits in Caribbean Paradises to avoid paying taxes or to hide unlawful transactions and tricks. That Mitt Romney plays dirty games and ugly tricks is something that my intuition strongly tells me.

He is the supreme opportunist in Business and Politics ... But what is the use of that to guide a nation ??.

At least President Obama is a honest and decent guy, and a great lawyer and intellectual. I do not have the slightest doubt that Obama is a guy with greater intellectuality and knowledge of History than Mitt Romney. Obama has a greater knowledge of the human heart, Obama has greater humanity and kindness than Mitt Romney.

Mitt has the qualities of the Economic Predator and Political Con Man, a swindler and deceiver. Like his Mormon "prophets" Joseph Smith and Brigham Young.


Vicente Duque
.....

Robert Reich : "Mitt Romney wants to increase the incomes of people earning more than $1 million a year by an average of $295,874 annually - By reducing government revenues, Romney's tax cuts would squeeze programs for the poor even further"

.
Mitt Romney pays a very low tax rate on Big earnings of $20 million and he wants to pay even less with his absurd tax proposals. Mitt Romney is making as much as the combined earnings of a thousand American families at or just above the poverty line"

"Extending the Bush tax cuts will add $1.2 trillion to the nation's budget deficit in just two years".

What Mitt Romney wants is a Plutocracy with Racist Overtones. And the Middle Class will be downgraded and pushed to be very Poor.



San Francisco Chronicle
Middle class losing ground even amidst job growth
Sunday, February 12, 2012

By Robert Reich
Robert Reich, former U.S. secretary of labor, is professor of public policy at UC Berkeley and the author of "Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future."


Middle class losing ground even amidst job growth


Some excerpts :

Mitt Romney says he's not concerned about the very poor because they have safety nets to protect them. He says he's concerned about the middle class. Romney doesn't seem to realize how much of the middle class is becoming poor.

But Romney doesn't like safety nets to begin with. He has been accusing President Obama of inviting a culture of dependency. "Over the past three years, Barack Obama has been replacing our merit-based society with an entitlement society," he says over and over, arguing that our economic problems stem from a sharp rise in dependency. Get rid of these benefits and people will work harder.

He and other Republicans point to government data showing that direct payments to individuals have shot up by almost $600 billion since 2009, a 32 percent increase. And 49 percent of Americans now live in homes where at least one person is collecting a federal benefit such as food stamps or unemployment insurance, up from 44 percent in 2008.

But Romney and other Republicans have cause and effect backward. The reason for the rise in benefits is that Americans got clobbered in 2008, and many are still sinking. They and their families need whatever help they can get.

The real scandal is that America's safety nets are too small and shot through with holes. Only 40 percent of the unemployed qualify for unemployment benefits, for example, because they weren't working full time or long enough on a single job before they were let go.

The unemployment system doesn't recognize how many Americans work part time on several jobs, and move from job to job.

Romney's budget proposals would shred safety nets even more. According to an analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, his plan would throw 10 million low-income people off the benefit rolls for food stamps or cut benefits by thousands of dollars a year, or some combination.

"These cuts would primarily affect very low-income families with children, seniors and people with disabilities," the center concludes.

At the same time, Romney's tax plan would boost the incomes of America's most wealthy citizens, who are already taking home an almost unprecedented share of the nation's total income. Romney wants to permanently extend George W. Bush's tax cuts, reduce corporate income tax rates, and eliminate the estate tax.
.................