Sunday, August 7, 2011

TNR Ed Kilgore : "Keynes Is Dead, Just When We Need Him" - "It would take a truly monumental economic crisis to call off the deficit reduction doomsday machine and bring John Maynard Keynes back from the dead"

.
I have been following this important writer Ed Kilgore and his co-workers William Galston, Stan Greenberg and Ruy Teixeira. They launched "The Democratic Strategist". I have strong identification with this publication and its wonderful articles.



The New Republic
Keynes Is Dead, Just When We Need Him
by Ed Kilgore
August 6, 2011

Ed Kilgore is the Managing Editor of "The Democratic Strategist", he is also a special correspondent for The New Republic and a senior fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute. He was previously vice president for policy at the Democratic Leadership Council, communications director for former U.S. Sen. Sam Nunn (D-GA), and a federal-state liaison for three governors of his home state of Georgia.

William Galston, Stan Greenberg and Ruy Teixeira launched "The Democratic Strategist".

These important writers wrote this manifesto :

"We are launching this publication because we believe Democrats must begin to develop political strategies that look beyond the standard two- and four-year time horizons set by the American electoral calendar. Democrats must develop a set of concrete and coherent political strategies for regularly winning elections and over the longer term -- perhaps over a decade or more -- winning new areas of support and creating nothing less than a stable Democratic majority in the country".

"In playing this role, The Democratic Strategist will actively and energetically work to include all sectors of the Democratic community. While we as individuals have strong personal views, as co-editors of The Democratic Strategist, we will maintain a firmly neutral meeting ground for both centrists and populists, readers of The Nation and The New Republic, professional political consultants, grassroots activists and supporters of every significant candidate and perspective within the Democratic Party."


Keynes Is Dead, Just When We Need Him


Some excerpts :

When it comes to gaining Republican support, is the apparent popular rejection of Keynesianism enough to make conspicuous Hooverism acceptable? Don’t even non-Keynesians accept that drastic domestic spending cuts tend to directly boost unemployment, even if you deny claims of its other economic effects? Maybe so, but conservatives are so entrenched in the conviction that public-sector jobs aren’t “real,” and so focused on destroying public-sector unionism as a critical political asset for Democrats, that they’re likely willing to run the risk of boosting short-term unemployment. As recently as Tuesday, the GOP was getting lathered up to go after deeper cuts in FY 2012 domestic appropriations. And while progressive claims that Republicans are deliberately trying to sabotage the economy are perhaps unfair, there’s no question they realize the president and his party will get the bulk of the blame in 2012 for perpetually bad economic conditions.

Indeed, a better bet is that conservatives will double down on their own conviction that the only way to bring back economic growth is through deregulation and tax cuts, accompanied by spending cuts. And Democrats, who for their part still believe in Keynes even though they’ve concluded most of the public doesn’t, will resist new austerity measures, but they will also resist new high-end tax cuts in order to accommodate the remorseless demands of the deficit reduction process. Moreover, as the contents of the debt limit deal illustrated, Democrats have decided to make their chief partisan fiscal stand on the politically strong ground of opposing major long-term changes in Medicare and Social Security, even though entitlement reform is probably the only avenue to big-time deficit reduction measures that do not savage discretionary spending. So instead of coming together to deal with what could quickly become a genuine economic emergency, the two parties may soon be farther apart than ever.

When the “super-committee” convenes to accept or come up with an alternative to automatic spending cuts, mostly of the discretionary variety, an extended economic slump will only further reinforce the fact that there is no obvious “solution” that will be acceptable across party lines. That’s one reason analysts like Cassidy think both parties will figure out a way to junk the entire process. But with the spending-cut-obsessed Tea Party faction howling on the sidelines, it seems inconceivable that Republican congressional leaders will be in a position to suddenly announce that it’s decided Dick Cheney was right back in 2002 when he famously said, “Deficits don’t matter.” Indeed, it would take a truly monumental economic crisis to call off the deficit reduction doomsday machine and bring John Maynard Keynes back from the dead.
......

With such friends, you don't need enemies, with such patriots you don't need terrorists - Osama Bin Laden's soul should be laughing at the bottom of the sea or in Hell - Empires are always destroyed from inside

.
Yes, Empires die by suicide and not by homicide :



Empires die by internal divisions, disrespect for authority, plots and conspiracies against the legitimate rulers, social disorder encouraged by those that are somewhat sharing power like the Super Rich, the Wealthy Associations or Corporations, or a hostile House of Representatives.

Of course I refer to the "Debt Ceiling" Impasse and the disrespect for President Obama, but I am also saddened and impressed by the death of the Navy Seals and other Americans, like the chopter crew.

*******************

Turning to History for Consolation :

Israel is a great nation and a great History, Culture or Art that has endured by millennia. Many people like me admire, love and even envy the Jews for their talents and achievements.

And yet I do not believe that God made a pact with Abraham to turn Israel into the "Chosen People"...

I can say the same thing about some other nations : that I do not believe in the "Chosen People".

China is exceptional ! - Who can doubt that ??? - India is exceptional ?? - Who can doubt that ?? - Same for Russia, Brazil, South Africa, etc .... Fill the dots with many nations that you like. Every nation is exceptional. All people are exceptional and chosen by God.

Nobody is illegal, much less a child or youngster that has lived 80% of his live in American Territory and that can speak English better than any other language. And that is in America because he or she was brought at a tender age.

***********************

Everybody is mortal, and I have not seen the invulnerable Gods.

The tragic death of 31 Americans in Afghanistan in a Helicopter crash is very sad and undeserved, and we feel pity and sympathy for their families : widows, mothers, children, etc ...

But we also feel pity for the thousands upon thousands of "Third Worlders" that have died in these absurd and useless wars, and the millions that have been unjustly dislodged and dispossessed. Because of the whims of some madmen in Washington with the help of Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda.

Even the expressions "Third World" and "Third Worlders" may be charged with disrespect and derision and are suspect for me.

At the end, and looking at the problems that September 11 has created, it seems like Osama Bin Laden was a successful "suicide bomber", he paid with his life, but was highly successful in creating lots of trouble for the USA.

Only the mentally retarded can believe that these wars in Muslim Countries are defending the Western World from "Terrorism" or that this has a positive effect anywhere.

Where are the positive effects of these wars ?? - In which country do you see progress, economic development, peace, harmony, cultural advancement because of this violence and brutality.

What has torture achieved ?? - The death of Osama Bin Laden, but that is a small prize for all the destruction of Human Lives and Properties.

***********.

With such friends, you don't need enemies, with such patriots you don't need terrorists - The pundits of the Press, Television and the Media in general, that feed the violence and wars are the worst enemies of America. The cure that they offer is worse than the disease.

And the people that kidnap the American Government with "debt ceilings" are not very helpful for the Greatness of Empire.


..............




Vicente Duque

Saturday, August 6, 2011

Pastor friends of Rick Perry, Christian Evangelicals : "Oprah Winfrey is a harlot preparing the coming of the Anti-Christ" - "Gays are butchers that enjoy tortures and murder" - "Statue of Liberty is Demonic" - "Catholic Church is the Great Whore"

.
Chris Matthews criticizes Rick Perry for paling with freaks and cretins of Religion :

The crackpots and idiots that join Governor Rick Perry in a Political Religious Gathering in Houston, Texas.


"The Harlot Babylon is preparing the nations to receive the antichrist"





****************



Oprah Winfrey Called 'Antichrist' by Christian Evangelical


http://www.christianpost.com/news/oprah-winfrey-called-antichrist-by-christian-evangelical-52366/



Excerpts :


Mike Bickle, leader of the International House of Prayer (IHOP), has said that 57-year-old former talk show host Oprah Winfrey is “the antichrist.”


Bickle has received criticism and backlash for his statements in a film released by People for the American Way Right Wing Watch which was aired on God TV.


He stated, “I believe that one of the main pastors, as a forerunner to the Harlot movement, it’s not the Harlot movement yet, is Oprah.”


The evangelical pastor continued, “She is winsome, she is kind, she is reasonable, she is utterly deceived, utterly deceived… “


The “Harlot movement” Bickle speaks of includes doing good deeds “for all the wrong reasons.”


He called Winfrey “a classy woman, a cool woman, but has a spirit of deception and she is one of the clear pastors, forerunners to the Harlot movement.”


**********************************


Uploaded by CRUClEFICTION on Aug 5, 2011


Hardball with Chris Matthews, MSNBC, 8-5-2011


Governor Rick Perry of Texas is holding an official prayer "response" for Americans to come to Jesus, at Reliant Stadium, Houston, TX, August 6, 2011.


Barry Lynn, Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State.


Tony Perkins, President of the Family Research Council



Meet Gov. Rick Perry's Choice of Preachers for Jesus




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8HI9TG0lOc

.

NATO copter shot down in Afghanistan, 31 U.S. troops killed, many of them navy seals, also eight Afghan troops killed in the helicopter crash. - Deadliest incident for USA in the nearly 10-year-old war

.
Washington Post -
NATO copter shot down; dozens of U.S. troops killed -
By Kevin Sieff and Sayed Salahuddin -
Saturday, August 6, 2011 -


NATO copter shot down; dozens of U.S. troops killed


Some excerpts :

KABUL — A NATO helicopter was shot down during an overnight operation against the Taliban in eastern Afghanistan, a U.S. official said. The crash killed 31 U.S. service members and eight Afghan troops, according to Afghan President Hamid Karzai, making it the deadliest incident for the coalition in the nearly 10-year-old war.

The U.S. official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the matter, said the aircraft was most likely brought down by a rocket-propelled grenade and that many of the dead were Navy SEALs. The Taliban asserted responsibility for the crash, which occurred in Wardak province, just west of the capital, Kabul.

Karzai said in a statement that the Chinook aircraft had been operating in an area of heavy insurgent activity.

Saturday’s crash comes during a surge of violence across large swaths of Afghanistan, particularly in the east, which has become a flash point in the conflict as American troops prepare for a phased withdrawal from the country. The incident threatened to shake confidence in NATO’s air power — a key asset in the war and a important element of combat support offered to Afghans, who lack an air force of their own.

Residents of Sayedabad district in Wardak who were awake for an early morning Ramadan prayer reported hearing a rocket-propelled grenade being fired and then a loud explosion. Flames lit the night sky, they said.

“Then American forces began searching houses and blocked the roads of the village,” said Sana Gal, 35, a resident of Tangi, a village a few hundred yards from the crash site.

A Taliban spokesman, Zabiullah Mujahid, said an insurgent shot down the helicopter with a rocket-propelled grenade after the conclusion of a firefight in which eight Taliban fighters were killed.
.

Friday, August 5, 2011

Huffpost : Polls Analyst Mark Blumenthal : While dismay has been evident among those in President Barack Obama's liberal base, the deal may provoke even more of an intra-party backlash against Republican lawmakers who supported it

.
Huffington Post
Gallup Poll: Republican Base More Dissatisfied With Debt Ceiling Deal Than Democratic Base
By Mark Blumenthal ( Polls Analyst )
August 3, 2011


Gallup Poll: Republican Base More Dissatisfied With Debt Ceiling Deal Than Democratic Base


Some excerpts :

WASHINGTON -- A new USA Today/Gallup poll conducted Tuesday night finds that more Americans oppose (46 percent) than favor (39 percent) the debt ceiling agreement passed by Congress this week, largely confirming the results of a CNN/ORC survey conducted the day before. While both show a lack of enthusiasm about the deal across political lines, Republicans and conservatives express far more disapproval than do Democrats.

The two surveys provide a largely consistent picture of how attitudes about the agreement break down along party and ideological lines. According to the Gallup poll, a majority of Democrats (58 percent) and liberals (51 percent) approve of the deal, although significant minorities of both groups express disapproval (28 and 35 percent respectively). The results are reversed on the other side, with large majorities of Republicans (64 percent) and conservatives (64 percent) expressing disapproval. Although the CNN poll found fewer Americans with no opinion than the Gallup poll did, their results were similar by party and ideology.
.

POLITICO.COM "The Arena" Forum - Obama is down but not out - Asset : Obama's demeanor. Obama is loved and admired for his personality, kindness, nice and cool, steady in office - Obama does not get rattled and always wants to do the right thing for America

.
Republicans are burying President Obama and many "externalities" and "appearances" seem to give reason to their allegations of Obama's political demise - But this Obama is an extraordinary young man and has a lot of resiliency, endurance, flexibility, stamina, vigor, youth, dynamism, strength, sufferance, tolerance, survival, energy, aliveness, animation, life, shrewdness, Chicago pol magic, intelligent scholar, charm, professorial toughness, bullfighting power against ever charging republican bulls or elephants, and excellent personality qualities.


I think that those that love Obama give us more hints about his personality, skills and capacity than those paid Republicans that are inserting campaign lines and propaganda pills of fear, pessimism, doom, impending catastrophe and even hatred.

And there are even Republicans that think that Obama is a "hard to crack" nut.



POLITICO.COM "The Arena" Forum
August 4, 2011

POLITIOCO.COM "The Arena" Forum - Obama is down but not out


Some positive opinions about President Obama. Some excerpts :


*************************************************


State Rep. Josh Byrnes Iowa House of Representatives (R) :

I think Obama has two things going for him that makes him hard to beat. First, he is going to raise a record level of money. Secondly, there is not a clear front runner for the Republicans. Most Republicans seem to still be waiting for that dynamic candidate to jump in the race.


*********************************************


Christopher Hahn Democratic consultant :

In a normal political environment low approval and high unemployment would spell certain doom for an incumbent president. The current political environment is far from normal.

Obama will likely face a tea party fueled extremist who will scare the middle back to the Democratic Party. Regardless of what his base is saying today, they will support the president out of fear of what could come if they don't. Obama will need every cent of the $1 billion he plans to raise for this race to fight off the vicious attacks that will be hurled by shadowy "independent" groups. In the end, the nation will give him four more years.


******************************


Eileen Shields-West Author, 'The World Almanac of Political Campaigns' :

Last Saturday, President Reagan's speechwriter Peggy Noonan declared flat out that "nobody loves Obama." She went on to say, "He is a loser. And this is America, where nobody loves a loser."
So, is that the end of the once breathtaking Obama story? I think not. As they say in the ring, "He is down, but not out."

For several reasons: There is no significant Republican challenger right now. Even the Republicans themselves seem uncertain whom they favor, many out of the hope that someone else will enter the race. While the debt ceiling crisis, did not turn in the president's favor with a "Grand Bargain" that he could tout, at least it finally got resolved and the president can seize the opportunity and move on, as he is doing with his bus tour of the Midwest on August 15.

Another factor in his favor is his demeanor. Although he may not be "loved" in the sense that Clinton was, I think he is admired for his steadiness in office. Now, perhaps people would like to see him a bit more fired up at times, but generally the American public likes a leader who does not get rattled and who seems to want to do the right thing. These are pluses for Obama.

What could trip Obama up, of course, is the direction of the unemployment rate. It has got to be trending down in the months before the election. Ronald Reagan got a landslide victory in 1984 with 7.2 percent unemployment but he was able to claim that he was bringing it down because it had peaked 23 months before Election Day.

Another possible obstacle to re-election is a "third way." There is a viable, centrist movement underway to elect by Internet convention a third candidate to run in 2012. This third way is trying to register in all fifty states and then conduct a national election for a candidate via the internet. Such a candidacy could possible divide the vote of independents and hurt Obama. Many independents just loved Obama in 2008.


********************************


Diana Furchtgott-Roth Senior fellow, Hudson Institute :

President Obama will win the election if Republicans don’t have a candidate. So far, no leading opponent to Obama has emerged.

Furthermore, as the first African American president, Obama has a broad base of supporters who will fight for his reelection. Finally, his campaign war chest is substantial and will grow in the coming months.

The stagnating economy will help Republicans - I’m not quite sure how the president can run on “Four More Years.” But they need to come up with a leader with charisma and character who can make a compelling case to the American people that lower taxes, less government spending, and less burdensome regulation are the keys to recovery.


********************************

Peter Fenn Democratic media consultant :

It's a long way until Nov. 2012 and Obama has a lot going for him. He made the tough decisions on helping the auto industry and it paid off, saving three million jobs. His stimulus put more money in people's pockets and stopped the bleeding created by the economic meltdown.

The American people believe in him personally and like him. One of the keys to his victory will be to be tougher on the Republican extremism and intransigence, to be a lot more "Give 'em Hell" Harry Truman and a lot less "cool" Calvin Coolidge.


********************************


Aaron David Miller Former State Department official; Wilson Center scholar; author :

I can’t figure out what I’m doing next Tuesday; let alone predict the arc of Obama’s fortunes in November 2012. But I’d say the odds - however gloomy the situation looks now - favor victory. History and the Republicans are on his side.

Since 1980, only one lonely American president - Bush 41 - has failed to gain reelection to a second term. In fact if Obama does win, we’re about to do something historic: three different two-term presidents in a row: Clinton, Bush 43 and Obama. Not since Jefferson, Madison, Monroe has that happened.

Curiously while our local/state/congressional politics crumble, we seem to want a measure of stability and predictability in the one and only national job that we actually have a role in choosing. The fact is, we like these guys; and want to give them the benefit of the doubt.

With no primary challenger and plenty of money, the president also has no credible Republican opponent yet. The question is this; what will be worse by next year? The economy or the his Republican opponent?


*******************************


Christine Pelosi Attorney, author and Democratic activist :

Barack Obama will be reelected president of the United States. The work he jas done to rescue the shambled economy he inherited and to tackle jobs, healthcare reform, Wall Street reform, DADT repeal, veterans needs, equal pay, plus the of killing Osama bin Laden will earn him a second term.

While self-described Republican hostage takers have overreached and turned off independents, Obama base voters will come home knowing that we only get a progressive president if we get a progressive Congress and a progressive movement fighting for jobs and shared prosperity.

The economy will foretell all incumbents' job security, including the president's, but you can't beat something with nothing. The weak economic recovery strengthens the case for a Republican nominee, but the weak Republican field missing in action on jobs, growth, and debt solutions strengthens President Obama's political recovery. Sure President Obama took a political hit this week - but at least he was in the arena not cowering in the Mittness Protection Program. If Republicans want to win, they have to do more than root for President Obama and America to fail: they must get in the arena and say what they would do better.


*************************************


Garry South Democratic consultant, The Garry South Group :

The Republican field is exceedingly weak, and every one of the candidates have their own electibility problems. You can't beat somebody - and especially a sitting president - with nobody, and the GOP crop isn't even very appealing to Republicans, as witness the revelation that only one in five big George W. Bush bundlers have contributed to any of the current candidates. I'd still put my money on Obama.


****************************************


Sandy Maisel Professor of government, Colby College :

The president’s reelection chances are not as rosy as they once were, to be sure, but there is an old saying in politics: You cannot beat someone with no one. As of now, none of the GOP potential candidates has shown the ability to capture the nation’s fancy. As the field looks pretty well set, the president’s chances seem higher than his poll ratings would imply.


*********************************************


David B. Cohen Associate professor of political science, The University of Akron :

President Ronald Reagan was at 43 percent in the Gallup Poll at the beginning of August 1983 (the exact point in his presidency that Barack Obama is at now). Fifteen months later he won a landslide victory for reelection. Lesson: if twenty four hours is a lifetime in politics, fifteen months is an eon.

Although things look bad for President Obama’s reelection at this moment in time, fortunately for him the election is not next week. It is impossible to predict what will happen over a year from now or to predict whether or not President Obama will be reelected. One thing that political scientists are sure of, however: if the economy improves substantially and unemployment falls, this will help the president immensely. If the economy continues to stagnate or worsen, President Obama is in huge trouble.


***************************************


Thomas J. Whalen Professor of Social Science, Boston University :

Everything depends on the quality of opposition being presented. If you have a tea party extremist like Michele Bachmann or a self-professed secessionist like Rick Perry running against you, then President Obama can rest somewhat easier.

But if he has a politically flexible GOP moderate like Mitt Romney - all bets are off. Still, it's never easy to unseat an incumbent president. Even in 1980, when the economy was going south and the Iranian hostage crisis was sapping US.. prestige abroad, Jimmy Carter was still in a virtual dead heat with Ronald Reagan with weeks to go in the race.

It took a bravura nationally televised debate performance by Reagan ("Are you better off now than you were four years ago?") to finally break the electoral log jam. It may require a similar kind of performance to unseat Obama in 2012.


********************************************


Jeffrey C. Stewart Professor of Black Studies at University of California at Santa Barbara :

Obama has a good chance of being reelected because of several factors. First is the likely opposition. Prayer Perry? Please. Bachmann? Only if the sky falls. Romney? About as charismatic as chicken soup. And the tea party types will never bite in droves for someone who passed Obamacare before Obama.The others are political zeroes.

Second, as bad as the economy is, the real question for voting blocks like seniors, the aging babyboomers, kids getting ready to go to college is - do you want someone in there who will go along completely with dismantling the New Deal safety and education investment net? As a 65-year old, do you want to see the end of Medicare as we know it? Because that is what will happen if a Republican becomes president in 2012.

Regardless of his numerous weaknesses, and they are legion - just ask Cornel West, the self-appointed presidential critic - Obama has become the president of the United States. As Bush found out, though, becoming legitimated as the president means becoming the hated father-figure who absorbs all of our frustration because the American empire is in decline if not over.

What Obama needs to do is to start preaching with the language of the American Adam, the rhetoric of reinvention, how America is exceptional in our capacity to create something new and spectacular every couple of decades and transform the world. He needs to draw attention to our creativity, which is fueled not weakened by diversity, despite what the xenophobes tell you. He needs to remind America like the football team it is that the game is not over, that we can still pull this out - and so can he if he abandons Washington, takes that message to the people, and becomes rallier-in-chief.


******************************


Greg Dworkin Contributing Editor, Daily Kos :

Events, including the economy, will decide the election, but Obama is holding up remarkably well all things considered, and incumbents are hard to beat. He can lose, but he’ll have a united party behind him and the Republican that will beat him hasn’t materialized yet, nor has a united party behind the nominee.

Romney remains unpopular with a large segment of the GOP base without the skills to recruit them, and as POLITICO points out today, Rick Perry has some major issues to overcome, including questionable appeal outside of Texas to non-Republicans.

And remember, the very serious candidates Pawlenty and Huntsman are, to be charitable, struggling. Bachmann has her own baggage to lug amid questions about her national infrastructure. As to whether Obama goes down or up from here, and whether the Republican brand is steeping in a tea cup (don’t forget, the time will come when the Republican nominee either has to embrace or run from the extremists in the House, and if it’s Romney, that includes Bachmann and Perry), that all remains to be seen.


**************************


Ex-Assemblyman Arthur 'Jerry' Kremer Chairman, Empire Government Strategies; former New York assemblyman :

There is an old expression that you "can't beat somebody with a nobody." It is hard to oust an incumbent without a charismatic smart candidate who is not the captive of the tea party. The tea party is the best thing going for Obama as they will pull the eventual nominee too far to the right. There is lots of time to go before the next election.


******************************
.

Thursday, August 4, 2011

Mitt Romney is accused of Cowardice, Insincerity, Opportunism, Hypocrisy and Lies : By Time.com, The Dailyt Beast, The Moderate Voice, Politico.com and many others. This guy looks at polls before speaking to see the direction of the opinion winds

.
Mitt Romney is a guy that does not lead but follows the winds of public opinion and his own selfish opportunism.

Mitt does not say what he believes is truth and America needs but what the primary voters need to be told in order to vote for him.


The Daily Beast
Link :


http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/08/01/mitt-romney-s-debt-ceiling-statement-makes-him-the-cowardly-candidate.html




Romney: The Cowardly Candidate
Mitt Romney could have grudgingly accepted the debt-ceiling deal. But instead, he’s bolstered his reputation for insincerity by pandering to the Tea Party, says Michael Tomasky.
Aug 1, 2011


Some excerpts :


Barack Obama got taken to school by Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, but he does have this much going for him: He’s probably going to be running for reelection against Mitt Romney, whose entry into the debt-ceiling debate was laughably late and wrong. Romney said Monday morning, after weeks of silence and after it was pretty apparent that the bill was going to pass, that “while I appreciate the extraordinarily difficult situation President Obama’s lack of leadership has placed Republican members of Congress in, I personally cannot support this deal.” He added that he couldn’t back a bill that “opens the door to higher taxes and puts defense cuts on the table.” So what do we make of this?

Romney is going straight Tea Party here. It’s interesting—you might have thought he’d conclude that Michele Bachmann had that market cornered. She, of course, voted no when the House passed the debt bill Monday night. She was one of 66 Republicans to do so. Those are Bachmann Republicans. You might have thought that the 174 Republicans who voted yes—the more “moderate” ones, and, after all, the ones on the winning side—were Romney’s crowd.

This is an excellent example of what’s wrong with the guy. He has very cowardly instincts. What would have been wrong with him saying something like, “Hey, as much as I hate it, I understand what Congress is like. As the song says, you can’t always get what you want, but I think Mitch McConnell and John Boehner took Barack Obama to the cleaners, and we’re nudging the needle in the right direction here. So with reservations about the defense spending and a caution that we must be absolutely vigilant that those wimpy Democrats don’t weaken our defenses and undermine our fighting men and women, I support it.”

Wouldn’t that have worked fine? It’s the establishment Republican position. The two leading Republicans in the country support it. Nearly 73 percent of House Republicans just backed that position, and a similar or probably even higher percentage of senators is going to back that position today. I also can’t imagine that a large number of Republican high-dollar donors are off in Bachmann land. So Romney had the chance to make a distinction between himself and the woman who now appears positioned to be his chief challenger.

So why didn’t he? Iowa. The two Republicans from Iowa in the House, Steve King and Tom Latham, both voted against the deal. Romney will have to finish respectably in the state to stay alive. And throw in South Carolina, where all five Republican representatives voted against the deal. Interestingly, the two Republicans who represent New Hampshire in the House both voted for the deal, but Romney probably felt he didn’t need to go with them because he feels he already has that state in the win column.
Mitt Romney
.



**************


TIME.COM

link here :

http://swampland.time.com/2011/08/01/profile-in-cowardice-mitt-romney-rejects-the-debt-deal/

TIME.COM
Viewpoint
Profile in Cowardice: Mitt Romney Rejects the Debt Deal
By Joe Klein Monday, August 1, 2011 | 92 Comments

Mitt Romney demonstrates, yet again, why he lacks the character for higher office:

“As President, my plan would have produced a budget that was cut, capped and balanced – not one that opens the door to higher taxes and puts defense cuts on the table. President Obama’s leadership failure has pushed the economy to the brink at the eleventh hour and 59th minute. While I appreciate the extraordinarily difficult situation President Obama’s lack of leadership has placed Republican Members of Congress in, I personally cannot support this deal.”

This graceless kow-tow to the Tea Party makes sense politically. But it is a lie. His “plan” could never have passed. Furthermore, by releasing this crap this morning, he hasn’t made Boehner’s task any easier in gathering votes for this dreadful-but-less-dreadful-than-any-other-votable alternative. Yecch.

*****************************

The Moderate Voice :

link :

http://themoderatevoice.com/118492/mitt-romney-and-the-debt-ceiling-limit-crisis-profile-in-political-cowardice/


The Moderate Voice
Mitt Romney and the Debt Ceiling Limit Crisis: Profile in Political Cowardice
Posted by JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief in Economy, Politics.
Aug 1st, 2011


Some excerpts :

Well, no one can accuse Mitt Romney of not being transparent.

Romney has apparently stuck his finger up in the wind to see which way vital Tea Party sentiments were going on the debt ceiling limit issue.

For weeks he has had his finger stuck in a much shadier area on this issue.

But now the big battle is over and he needs Tea Party votes so suddenly he is speaking out:

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) broke his silence on the congressional debt-ceiling fight on Monday, emerging to say he couldn’t back the final deal announced Sunday.

Romney, who had refused to weigh in during recent weeks on the specifics of various proposals to raise the debt ceiling, said he couldn’t personally back the deal brokered over the weekend between congressional GOP leaders and President Obama.

“While I appreciate the extraordinarily difficult situation President Obama’s lack of leadership has placed Republican Members of Congress in, I personally cannot support this deal,” he said in a statement.

Romney joins Rep. Michele Bachmann (Minn.) as another member of the Republican presidential field to oppose the deal, which has been sold by GOP leaders to rank-and-file members as the best achievable plan.

I need to add that I have long been an admirer of Romney. I’m one of those who LIKED his incarnation as a moderate Republican governor. And when I’ve done some of those CNN spots, several techs and drivers have told me that they met Romney and he is a great guy. Plus, I admire his business experience.

But this statement confirms what his critics on the right say about him and his former supporters on the left will say: he goes where the wind blows.

The most consistent thing about Mitt Romney is his hair.

********************************

POLITICO.COM

link :

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0811/Romney_finally_opposes_deal.html


POLITICO
Ben Smith
Romney, finally, opposes deal

August 01, 2011


Some excerpts :

Romney, finally, opposes deal

A very careful Romney finally breaks his silence:

As president, my plan would have produced a budget that was cut, capped and balanced – not one that opens the door to higher taxes and puts defense cuts on the table. President Obama’s leadership failure has pushed the economy to the brink at the eleventh hour and 59th minute. While I appreciate the extraordinarily difficult situation President Obama’s lack of leadership has placed Republican Members of Congress in, I personally cannot support this deal.

Romney has been, to this point, positioning himself for a general election; this statement marks the limits of what he can get away with in the primary.


************************

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

The New Republic : Debt Deal forces GOP Nominee to the Right - Impossible to Pivot to the Center - Conservatives in Congress and in the early primary states are doing everything they can to help Democrats paint devil horns on their eventual nominee

.
General election strategy for Obama and Democrats : Frighten swing voters and unhappy progressives with the specter of what an extremist Republican government might do.

Obama has invaded the Center and the Land of Independents. It makes impossible for the GOP Nominee to use the same narrative and paint himself or herself as a Republican Moderate.

The Republican Party is now dominated by Ideology and Stubborn Ideologes with no slack and no flexibility, they have no room for maneuver and change of ideas. They are not adjustable and adaptable to new situations.

Obama being a moderate, centrist and compromiser has made the task of creating enthusiasm for their bigotry and fanaticism more difficult.



The New Republic
The Debt Deal Makes It Nearly Impossible for the GOP Nominee to Pivot to the Center
By Ed Kilgore
Ed Kilgore is a special correspondent for The New Republic.
August 3, 2011


The Debt Deal Makes It Nearly Impossible for the GOP Nominee to Pivot to the Center


Some excerpts :

The big debt limit vote in Congress, it is increasingly obvious, is just an appetizer for the divisive, voter-alienating struggles it has built into the schedule at key points during the 2012 presidential campaign, making an eventual GOP presidential nominee’s efforts to “pivot to the center” an athletic feat, at best. And as Tea Party activists and other conservatives have made clear in their reactions to the deal just signed, their efforts to force everyone in the GOP to join in future hostage-taking exercises aimed at middle-class entitlements and other targets beloved of voters have just begun.

Indeed, this week’s agreement didn’t really kick the can that far down the road. In September, after the field has finally filled out and been winnowed in Ames, congressional conservatives will be engaged in a savage fight to cut domestic appropriations—complete, no doubt, with government shutdown threats—below the levels spelled out in the debt limit deal. Another provision of the deal requires that when the current “temporary” debt limit is reached, probably around the end of September, the president must request another increase in the limit, which will lead to a “disapproval” vote in Congress and, if it passes, a presidential veto and a veto override vote (all just Kabuki theater, but a noisy and divisive exercise nonetheless).

Soon after that, an even bigger battle over the “debt committee” recommendations, and the fallback automatic spending cuts that will be triggered in their stead, will break out, culminating in December when the candidates competing in the early primary states will be in a full-on teeth-grinding frenzy for votes. Both these fights will inevitably involve trade-offs—between entitlement cuts, defense spending cuts, and tax increases—that divide the GOP and the country, and they will force candidates to choose again and again between the views of Tea Party activists—including early primary-state Big Dogs like Jim DeMint—and the general public.

And that hardly ends the gauntlet of fiscal litmus tests. As TNR’s Jonathan Cohn explained yesterday, the scheduled expiration of the Bush tax cuts, and the next anticipated deadline for yet another debt increase, will coincide at the end of 2012, casting a long shadow over the presidential campaign. Budget guru Stan Collender has summed it up: “It’s absolutely certain Congress and the president, the House and Senate, and Democrats and Republicans will all be fighting constantly over the budget during the next 18 months.”

..........

Monday, August 1, 2011

British Telegraph : US debt crisis : Obama looks like a winner - A centrist reborn : Obama is reaching out to independent voters - The 11th hour deal could save Obama’s presidency. In the popular mind, it has turned Obama from a liberal into a moderate.

.
British Telegraph -
US debt crisis: Barack Obama looks like a winner -
The Republican Party seems guilty of delaying the debt deal, while the President has won the centre ground. -
A centrist reborn: Barack Obama is reaching out to independent voters -


By Tim Stanley
August 1, 2011


US debt crisis: Barack Obama looks like a winner


Some excerpts :

The 11th hour deal struck between the Democrats and the Republicans to raise the US debt ceiling could save Barack Obama’s presidency.
..............

In order to win the battle, the Republicans played a high-risk strategy. As a result, they may have lost the wider political war. The brinkmanship of the debt-ceiling talks has created a new narrative in American politics. In the popular mind, it has turned Obama from a liberal into a moderate, and the Republicans from free-market rationalists into economic vandals.

To get what he wanted, John Boehner pushed the country to the brink of defaulting on its debts. Ironically, the party of business came close to ruining America’s reputation as a place to do business.
...................

Pessimism about economic recovery and a palpable desperation for investment has made the average American voter wary of this kind of risk-taking. According to a recent CNN poll, 63 per cent of Americans do not believe that the Republicans have acted responsibly during the budget talks and 51 per cent say that the Grand Old Party will bear the brunt of the blame for any economic fallout. Only 30 per cent blame Obama for the crisis; 15 per cent blame both sides. There might be a demographic dimension to those statistics. Republican or Tea Party voters are largely white and old, and they are dying out. In contrast, the pool of Hispanic, African-American or poor voters who rely on the kind of government benefits imperilled by the crisis is growing fast. In many regards, the United States is becoming a social democratic nation by default.
.................

From the opposite wing of the Republican field, Mitt Romney stayed away from the debate and cemented his image as an opportunist. The loudest voice from the primary field was the Tea Party heavyweight Michele Bachmann, who opined that the US government had “spent its wad” and was beyond fiscal redemption. In short, the new focus on Obama v Boehner has exposed the Republican presidential contest as the political equivalent of amateur hour.

...............

Romney and Bachmann reject Debt Deal - "Spends too much and doesn't cut enough" Bachmann said - Romney : - It Could Lead To Higher Taxes, Defense Cuts" - Huntsman : "It provides the only avenue to avoid default"

.

My comment : The Republicans forced the "Debt Deal" on President Obama and the Democrats. I have an intuition that it may backfire and harm the Republican Candidates and the GOP.


Huffington Post
Romney Rejects Debt Deal, Says It Could Lead To Higher Taxes, Defense Cuts
By Jon Ward
August 1, 2011

Romney Rejects Debt Deal, Says It Could Lead To Higher Taxes, Defense Cuts


Some excerpts :

WASHINGTON -- Republican presidential primary front-runner Mitt Romney rejected the debt ceiling deal reached over the weekend, saying it will lead to tax increases and cuts in military spending.

"As president, my plan would have produced a budget that was cut, capped and balanced -- not one that opens the door to higher taxes and puts defense cuts on the table," Romney said in a statement.

"President Obama's leadership failure has pushed the economy to the brink at the eleventh hour and 59th minute. While I appreciate the extraordinarily difficult situation President Obama's lack of leadership has placed Republican Members of Congress in, I personally cannot support this deal," Romney said.

Romney's statement came after critics -- including fellow Republican presidential candidate Jon Huntsman -- assailed the former Massachusetts governor for not weighing in sooner on the debt negotiations. Romney advisers said they were taking a cautious approach to avoid commenting before the contours of a deal became clear.

The assertion that the deal will raise taxes flies in the face of predictions from conservative pundits that it will be nearly impossible for Democrats to wring any tax increases out of the new committee charged with coming up with the second of round deficit reduction measures.

Huntsman, the former U.S. ambassador to China and Utah governor, supported the deal in a statement on Sunday night, saying that it "forces a vote on a much-needed federal balanced budget amendment and provides the only avenue to avoid default."

But Romney's rejection of the deal put him on the same page, in this case at least, with Tea Party favorite Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), who blasted the agreement soon after details emerged Sunday evening. Bachmann mocked President Obama, who said in announcing the deal that "the American people's voice" had helped hasten the agreement.
Advertisement

"Mr. President, I'm not sure what voice you're listening to, but I can assure you that the voice of the American people wasn't the 'voice that compelled Washington to act,'" Bachmann said. "Everywhere I travel across the country, Americans want less spending, lower taxes to create jobs, and they don't want us to raise the debt ceiling."

The agreed upon $2.4 trillion increase in the debt ceiling -- with commensurate cuts -- "spends too much and doesn't cut enough," Bachmann said.
.