"The ultimate objective behind "attrition through enforcement" : preventing the "browning" of America" is nonetheless doomed to fail because it is on a collision course with seismic demographic shifts that are already underway"

.

"If the Court gives its blessing to this coordinated “attrition through enforcement” strategy and allows SB 1070 and its progeny to be implemented, the nation will return to a time of deep division, likely cleaved once again along regional lines, with some states passing welcoming laws, and others passing restrictive ones".

My Comment : If the U. S. Supreme Court declares War against President Obama and the Department of Justice then the Justices are going to lose sooner or later, because they may help the Presidential Reelection and sooner or later the Court will be more Liberal and less dedicated to Conservative Judicial Activism.

I can say the same for the Affordable Care Act ( ACA ), also called ObamaCare. Try to stop the President and Congress and legislate from the bench and the public will reelect President Obama.

Tucson Sentinel
What's at stake if Supreme Court rules for SB 1070?
By Marshall Fitz & Jeanne Butterfield
Center for American Progress
Apr 6, 2012


What's at stake if Supreme Court rules for SB 1070?


Some excerpts :

These anti-immigrant laws, even the ones currently blocked by the courts, have created a climate of fear and division within these states and have triggered a cascade of counterproductive real-world consequences. Some immigrant families decided to leave these states altogether and move to other, more welcoming states rather than accept this state-sponsored marginalization.

As a result, whole sectors of these states’ economies have suffered irreparable harm as immigrant workers either stayed home or left the state and were no longer available to harvest crops or perform other needed services. Companies and organizations that didn’t want their own members to face these draconian laws withdrew their businesses from these states, further extending and deepening the negative economic impact of these ill-conceived new immigration laws.

The significant social and economic harm that has already flowed from the enactment of these laws underscores the potentially monumental importance of the Supreme Court’s decision in the Arizona case. What is at stake is not merely a technical and esoteric legal argument. The ruling in this case could have profound implications, not only for the citizens and immigrants living in states with Arizona-style laws but also for the unity of the nation and the preservation of our core values.

**************************