Saturday, January 7, 2012

Super Conservative Weekly Standard : Super Conservative William Kristol ( sarcastic ) : "If Romney, having beaten Santorum by all of eight votes in Iowa, wins in New Hampshire, where he has a summer home and has been campaigning for six years, "well, then we should all just accept the inevitability of Romney"."

.
"After all, then “Romney is 2-0.” And if he’s 2-0, by whatever margins and in states with 11 electoral votes—“he becomes the prohibitive favorite” for the nomination".

My Comment :

Super Conservative Magazines "National Review" and "Weekly Standard" are publishing articles praising the Santorum Fight against the Super Titan and Super Man Mitt Romney, also called "The Inevitable" or "The Chosen One by Fate"....

Let's think as Chinese Taoists ( five centuries before Jesus Christ ) : Is Mitt Romney "The Will of Heaven" ??

Answer : No Chinese Dragons from Heaven have descended to tell me that Mitt Romney is the "Man of Destiny" for the Republican Nomination.



Weekly Standard
All We Are Saying . . .
January 16, 2012

By William Kristol
William Kristol (born 1952) is an American neoconservative political analyst and commentator. He is the founder and editor of the political magazine The Weekly Standard and a regular commentator on the Fox News Channel.


All We Are Saying . . .


Some excerpts :

Really? Well, no. But the point is to convince Santorum supporters, and those of you who might consider becoming Santorum supporters, that he has no chance, so as to create a self-fulfilling prophecy of Romney inevitability. After all, “Mr. Santorum shouldn’t kid himself; he faces huge obstacles. . . . He hasn’t had to endure withering scrutiny but will shortly. His chief opponent has tremendous organizational and financial advantages and has been through the rigors of a presidential primary race.” Rove does note with gracious condescension, “Mr. Santorum has a shot, and that’s all he could have hoped for.”

Actually, Santorum can hope to win. He has been running to win. And after what he pulled off in Iowa, it’s foolish to suggest he doesn’t have a chance to win. His Iowa performance, and his speech Tuesday night, were impressive enough to suggest to primary voters in subsequent states that they should make an effort to judge both his capacity to win and his capacity to govern.

Organizational and financial advantages often prevail. But isn’t the story of America that they don’t always determine the outcome? And, by the way, if the candidate with those advantages does prevail, won’t he be better off for having faced a serious challenger?

The first and greatest Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, defeated more established candidates for the nomination in 1860. (He also knew how to co-opt parts of the establishment, a necessary skill for a successful politician—as Ronald Reagan also showed over a century later.)
..........

Santorum—and anyone else in the field, or anyone who may still enter—deserves “an open field and a fair chance” to compete for the “big White House” that Lincoln occupied. All American history is saying, and all we are saying, is . . . give Rick a chance.
............

No comments:

Post a Comment